Elected representatives : Servants or masters ?, by Abiodun Komolafe

  • Reading time:3 mins read
  • Post comments:0 Comments
You are currently viewing Elected representatives : Servants or masters ?, by Abiodun Komolafe
Representation image: This image is an artistic interpretation related to the article theme.

This statement by Cicero highlights the importance of historical knowledge in shaping our understanding of the present. Without a grasp of history, we risk becoming trapped in the present, unable to learn from the past and make informed decisions about the future. The study of history is not merely a collection of dates and names.

This decree, while seemingly simple, had profound implications for the political system. The decree’s impact was multifaceted. First, it significantly reduced the power of the political class. By linking political appointments to civil service positions, it effectively reduced the gap between the two. This meant that political appointees were now subject to the same salary and benefits as their civil service counterparts, thereby diminishing their perceived power and influence. Second, it fostered a sense of shared responsibility and accountability. The decree created a system where political appointees were no longer seen as separate entities with their own privileges.

The controversy centers around the proposed increase in the senators’ salaries and allowances. The proposed increase, which is seen as a blatant attempt to enrich the already well-fed political elite, has sparked outrage among Nigerians. The argument against the proposed increase is multifaceted. Firstly, it highlights the stark contrast between the exorbitant salaries and allowances of Nigerian politicians and the dire economic conditions faced by ordinary Nigerians. This disparity is a glaring example of the disconnect between the political elite and the masses.

These leaders, despite their immense influence, chose to live simple lives, demonstrating the power of ethical leadership. Gandhi’s philosophy of non-violent resistance, also known as Satyagraha, was a cornerstone of his leadership. Satyagraha emphasized the power of truth and non-violent action to achieve social change. This philosophy was rooted in his belief that violence only begets violence, and that true change could only be achieved through peaceful means. He used this philosophy to lead India’s independence movement, inspiring millions to join his cause.

This approach, while initially successful, eventually faced challenges due to the limitations of the Nigerian economy. The Nigerian constitution, adopted in 1999, introduced a system of checks and balances, aiming to prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful. This system, however, has been criticized for its complexity and lack of clarity, leading to frequent legal battles and political instability. The Nigerian judiciary, despite its independence, has faced challenges in upholding the rule of law and ensuring equal access to justice for all citizens. This has been exacerbated by corruption and lack of resources, leading to a perception of bias and unfairness.

The summary provided focuses on the importance of selfless leadership in achieving progress. It highlights the examples of Gandhi, Mandela, and Mujica as leaders who prioritized the welfare of their people over personal gain. The summary emphasizes that true progress can only be achieved when those in power prioritize the welfare of the people over personal gain.

Leave a Reply